Throughout his professional career, Kevin Mottus has worked largely in the fields of social work as well as public health and safety.
As an environmental health advocate, Kevin has dedicated the last 10 years to raising public awareness to the health threat posed by wireless radiation biological and health effects and to suggest wired, corded technology solution alternatives that are often much faster, more cyber secure, and more energy efficient than wireless while also eliminating the possibility of wireless radiation biological or health effects.
Ideally, wireless technology would be used to a minimum in combination with wired, corded technologies to maximize technological benefits while minimizing possible wireless radiation biological and health effects and while locating powerful cell tower transmitter/receivers as far away from humans as possible.
As wireless technology continues to grow in a very uneven way, wired technologies need to be more strongly considered, promoted, and funded by government bodies as safer alternatives to wireless.
In other countries, they are openly discussing wireless radiation biological and health effects and safer alternatives. In other countries, they are also talking more openly about the biological and health effects associated with Wifi Transmission especially in schools. In the US, much of the conversation and all of the health and safety regulation has been left up to the FCC which has been clearly reported to be an industry captured and biased agency see Captured Agency: How the FCC Is Dominated by the Industry It Presumably Regulates.
Importantly, the FCC is not a health and safety agency and has no biological expertise needed to assess the biological safety of wireless transmissions yet it is ultimately responsible for the health, safety and environmental impacts of wireless transmissions.
For more information and videos about these major issues, check out Kevin Mottus at http://kevinmottus.com/
Submit your review | |
Leave a Reply